World Cup 2026 Group F: Argentina, Tunisia, Iraq and Algeria

Argentina arrive in North America as the defending world champions - a title that brings confidence, expectation, and a particular kind of pressure that the history books suggest is hard to escape. Group F is effectively settled at the top before a ball is kicked. The question worth thinking carefully about is who joins them.

Create a Free World Cup Pool in 30 Seconds
Argentina
Defending champions, top seed
Algeria
African qualifier
Tunisia
African qualifier
Iraq
Asian qualifier - first WC since 1986

There are groups at this tournament where the top two is genuinely uncertain. Group F is not one of them - at least not for first place. Argentina are going to win this group. What makes Group F worth thinking carefully about is the identity of the second qualifier, because Algeria, Tunisia and Iraq are not separated by the gulf the seedings might imply.

Algeria come in having missed Qatar 2022 entirely - knocked out in a play-off against Cameroon in circumstances that still sit badly in their dressing room. They arrive in North America as one of the more experienced African sides in this edition, with a squad that draws heavily on French club football and a collective memory of 2014, when they reached the round of 16 before losing narrowly to Germany in extra time. Tunisia are a regular qualifier with a more disciplined, defensive identity - tough to play against and capable of grinding out results, but limited in attack. And Iraq are making history simply by being here: their last World Cup was in Mexico in 1986, forty years ago.

Argentina

Argentina

Defending champions

The Lusail Stadium on 18 December 2022 hosted one of the great World Cup finals. Argentina and France played out a 3-3 draw across 90 minutes and extra time - France coming back from two goals down to level, Argentina finding a third, France equalizing again deep in extra time - before Argentina held their nerve in the penalty shootout to claim their third World Cup title. If you want to understand the mental strength this Argentina side possesses in a knockout situation, that final is the evidence.

Lionel Messi will be 38 or 39 years old when this tournament begins. The conversation about whether Qatar 2022 would be his last World Cup ran for years before the tournament - and he confounded every prediction by continuing to play at a remarkable level and then winning the thing. Whether 2026 finds him still capable of influencing games at the highest level or whether his pace and mobility have reduced while his footballing intelligence remains elite, his presence changes how opponents approach Argentina entirely. No defender in Group F has the tools to neutralize him by effort alone.

Beyond Messi, the squad has real quality. Julian Alvarez has established himself as a striker who combines relentless work-rate with genuine goal threat and composure under pressure. The midfield has competitive quality and physical presence. The defensive organization under Lionel Scaloni has been the foundation of Argentina's success over recent years - well-positioned, hard to play through quickly, and disciplined in their defensive shape. They are not a team that will be troubled by any side in this group during the normal run of a game.

The honest prediction-pool note about Argentina is that the defending-champion burden tends to matter in the later rounds, not the group stage. No side has won back-to-back World Cups since Brazil in 1958 and 1962, and the pressure of being the team everyone wants to knock off tends to accumulate as the tournament progresses. For Group F, put them first and spend your analytical energy on the three positions below.

Attack90
Defence83
Tournament experience95

Algeria

Algeria

Most likely to take second

Algeria's absence from Qatar 2022 was the defining frustration of recent Algerian football. The play-off loss to Cameroon - which went to extra time and was decided by a late goal - ended a strong run of qualification campaigns and left a squad that felt it had more to offer without a stage to show it. The 2026 tournament is where that balance gets settled, and there is a palpable sense in Algerian football that this group has been waiting for this opportunity.

What makes Algeria the most plausible second-place finisher in Group F is the depth of European-level talent running through their squad. The connection between Algeria and French club football is well-established - many key players have grown up in the French system, competed in Ligue 1 and other European leagues, and bring technical standards and tactical awareness you would associate with a competitive European national team. Riyad Mahrez - who spent years at the top of the Premier League and became one of the most recognizable Algerian footballers of his generation - represents the calibre of player this squad has regularly produced. The current side carries that standard.

The challenge for Algeria in Group F is consistency across three games. They will be four years removed from a World Cup by the time the tournament begins, and reacclimating to that level of pressure and intensity is not trivial. Tunisia will provide a genuine test - the two sides know each other well, and North African derbies carry a history and intensity that makes them hard to predict. Iraq, physically direct and motivated by the weight of their occasion, could be awkward if Algeria approach their games with less focus than the matches demand. Algeria are my pick for second, but the pick requires them to be properly on it.

Attack71
Defence70
Individual quality73

Tunisia

Tunisia

Compact and hard to break down

Tunisia know how to survive a group stage. They have been here many times - Qatar 2022, Russia 2018, Germany 2006, Korea-Japan 2002 - and each time they have shown the kind of defensive resilience that makes them difficult opponents for sides that expect to impose themselves quickly. In Qatar, the headline result was a 1-0 win over France in the final group game, with France resting most of their starters having already qualified. The result told you something real about what Tunisia can do when organized and focused: even elite opponents can struggle against them on a given day.

Their style is built around shape, hard work and defensive solidity rather than technical superiority or creative flair. They will not outplay Algeria in possession, and they know it. What they can do is make games difficult, defend deep when required, exploit set-pieces, and keep themselves in matches long enough for a moment of quality - or a mistake from the opposition - to produce a result. The problem for Tunisia in Group F is that this approach works well as a base for not losing, but the side that finishes second needs to win games against opponents at a comparable level.

Tunisia's most realistic path to second place runs through Algeria dropping points - specifically an Algeria side that loses concentration against Iraq or produces a below-par performance in their head-to-head. If that happens, and Tunisia beat Algeria directly, the arithmetic becomes interesting. Their ceiling in Group F is second place; their more probable position is third. The variable is whether they can score goals when the games are tight, and their recent history suggests that remains the hardest thing for this side to do consistently.

Attack56
Defence80
Defensive organisation83

Iraq

Iraq

Historic qualifiers

The last time Iraq appeared at a World Cup, Diego Maradona had just scored the Hand of God against England and then produced one of the greatest individual goals in the history of the tournament in the same game. The 1986 edition in Mexico was Iraq's only previous World Cup - they went out in the group stage without a win - and forty years is a long time. The generation of players who will wear the Iraqi shirt in 2026 was not alive in 1986. Reaching this tournament represents a genuine footballing achievement for a country that has navigated extraordinary difficulty to sustain a national team programme at all.

Iraq are not simply here to take part. They have been among the more competitive sides in the Asian Football Confederation for a sustained period. Their 2007 AFC Asian Cup win - achieved during a period of severe national difficulty, with the final played at a neutral venue while the country itself was in turmoil - was a result that meant far more to millions of people than a football match normally could. That history of performing under pressure, of finding results when it matters, is part of this squad's DNA.

In Group F, the realistic target for Iraq is third place with enough points to keep alive their chance of advancing as one of the eight best third-placed teams across the 48-team format. A draw against either Algeria or Tunisia would be a result worth noting. Their game against Argentina will almost certainly go the way the form book says it should - but the other two matches are ones Iraq can genuinely compete in. A side making its first World Cup appearance in forty years, with the emotional weight that brings, often produces football in the opening rounds that surprises people who dismiss them on paper.

Attack57
Defence63
Team spirit82

In Group F, first place is settled before the opening whistle. The real competition is for second, and three teams with real arguments for it are going to make that fight properly competitive.

Where the group is decided

Argentina versus any of the other three is not where Group F is settled - at least not in the interesting sense. Argentina will manage those games and top the table. The meaningful action happens in the matches among the other three: Algeria versus Tunisia, Algeria versus Iraq, Tunisia versus Iraq.

The Algeria-Tunisia head-to-head is the pivotal match of this group. Two North African sides who know each other well, who have met many times in competitive football, and who arrive here with very different recent histories - Algeria returning after four years away, Tunisia the regular who has been here before. The team that wins that match secures a significant advantage in the second-place race. A draw means both sides depend more heavily on their results against Iraq.

Iraq's games against the two African sides are the wildcard element in Group F. If Iraq take a point off Algeria - a scenario that becomes more plausible if Algeria are tactically loose or underestimate the occasion - the arithmetic of the group becomes genuinely complex. The same applies if Iraq hold Tunisia to a draw or better. Every point Iraq pick up in those two games is a point taken directly from the second-place race.

My read is that Algeria's individual quality, when they are focused and competitive, is enough to see them through to second place. The distinction matters: Algeria at their best are technically sharp, quick in transition, and capable of creating from positions other sides cannot. Algeria at their complacent are ponderous in build-up and vulnerable on the counter-attack. The Algeria-Tunisia game will reveal which version has arrived.

Worth knowing: in the 48-team World Cup format, the eight best third-placed teams across all 12 groups advance to the Round of 32. A third-place finish with five or six points in Group F could still be enough to go through. Don't assume that finishing third in this group automatically means going home - particularly if Iraq or Tunisia collect points in unexpected places.

The case for Algeria versus the case for Tunisia

The second-place call in Group F essentially comes down to a choice between Algeria and Tunisia, and both sides have a credible argument. Algeria have the individual quality - European-level talent throughout the squad, real attacking threat from wide positions, the motivation of a four-year absence they want to make up for. Tunisia have the structure and discipline that makes them genuinely hard to break down, a reliable floor in competitive games, and the experience of having been at multiple World Cups and knowing how to manage the physical and mental demands.

The concern with Algeria is that individual quality requires collective organization and focus to actually produce results. A talented squad that is slightly off - overconfident, lacking urgency, or below-par in a key game - is still a talented squad that can lose to a well-organized, motivated opponent. Tunisia and Iraq are both capable of being that opponent on a specific day. The concern with Tunisia is the opposite: their floor is reliable but their ceiling is limited, and a group stage that requires winning games rather than just not losing them is a format that can expose the gap between being hard to beat and actually being good enough to beat others.

I pick Algeria second. But if you want to take a contrarian position in your prediction pool - swapping Algeria and Tunisia and predicting Tunisia ahead - you can make a reasonable case, and the pools that get decided on a few points often turn on exactly that kind of call.

Our predicted Group F finish

PosTeamReasoning
1ArgentinaDefending champions with the deepest squad and highest individual quality
2AlgeriaEuropean-level talent throughout; motivated by four years away from the World Cup
3TunisiaDefensively reliable but limited going forward; likely edged out on goal difference
4IraqHistoric qualifiers who will compete hard but face a significant experience gap

The second-to-fourth positions are genuinely uncertain. Tunisia finishing ahead of Algeria is the main alternative outcome - it requires Algeria to have a bad game at a key moment, which this generation of players has occasionally done. Iraq finishing third on points would require them to get the most out of their games against the two African sides, which is achievable if the motivation translates into performance.

How to call Group F in your pool

On FriendlyBet you rank all four teams from first to fourth, with points from each correctly placed team. Argentina first is the consensus call - almost everyone in your pool will pick it, so you will not gain or lose ground there. The points that separate prediction pools come from the other three positions.

The safe call is Argentina, Algeria, Tunisia, Iraq in order. The contrarian version - Argentina, Tunisia, Algeria, Iraq - is defensible if you believe Tunisia's structure and reliability makes them a safer second pick than Algeria's quality-dependent game. Both are reasonable. The Iraq-third-over-Tunisia-third call is longer odds but not impossible, and in a tight pool, getting that right while others put Tunisia third would be the kind of differential that wins the whole thing.

Create a free pool and predict Group F

Group F FAQ

Which teams are in World Cup 2026 Group F?
Argentina, Tunisia, Iraq and Algeria.
Who is favourite to win Group F?
Argentina are the clear favourites as the defending world champions. They won the 2022 World Cup in Qatar and are significantly ahead of the other three sides in squad quality and tournament experience.
When did Iraq last appear at a World Cup?
Iraq last appeared at a World Cup in 1986, when the tournament was held in Mexico. Their qualification for 2026 is their first in forty years and a significant moment for football in the country.
How does the 48-team format affect Group F?
With 12 groups of four teams, two sides qualify automatically and the eight best third-placed teams across all groups also go through. A third-place finish with five or six points in Group F is not automatically eliminated - it may still be enough to advance as one of the best third-placed teams in the tournament.

Related guides

Create a Free World Cup Pool in 30 Seconds